↓ Skip to main content

Genome sequence of Escherichia coli NCCP15653, a group D strain isolated from a diarrhea patient

Overview of attention for article published in Gut Pathogens, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome sequence of Escherichia coli NCCP15653, a group D strain isolated from a diarrhea patient
Published in
Gut Pathogens, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13099-016-0084-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Min-Jung Kwak, Myung-Soo Kim, Soon-Kyeong Kwon, Seung-Hak Cho, Jihyun F. Kim

Abstract

Pathogenic strains in Escherichia coli can be divided into several pathotypes according to their virulence features. Among them, uropathogenic E. coli causes most of the urinary tract infections and has a genotype distinct from other virulent strains of E. coli. In this study, we sequenced and analyzed the genome of E. coli NCCP15653 isolated from the feces of a diarrhea patient in 2007 in South Korea. A phylogenetic tree based on MLST showed that NCCP15653 belongs to the D group of E. coli and located in the lineage containing strains ST2747, UMN026 and 042. In the genome of NCCP15653, genes encoding major virulence factors of uropathogenic E. coli were detected. They include type I fimbriae, hemin uptake proteins, iron/manganese transport proteins, yersiniabactin siderophore proteins, type VI secretion proteins, and hemolysin. On the other hand, genes encoding AslA, OmpA, and the K1 capsule, which are virulence factors associated with invasion of neonatal meningitis-causing E. coli, were also present, while a gene encoding CNF-1 protein, which is a cytotoxic necrotizing factor 1, was not detected. Through the genome analysis of NCCP15653, we report an example of a genome of chimeric pathogenic properties. The gene content of NCCP15653, a group D strain, demonstrates that it could be both uropathogenic E. coli and neonatal meningitis-causing E. coli. Our results suggest the dynamic nature of plastic genomes in pathogenic strains of E. coli.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 25%
Student > Master 5 25%
Student > Bachelor 4 20%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 6 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 15%
Chemistry 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2016.
All research outputs
#18,443,697
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from Gut Pathogens
#383
of 523 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,913
of 298,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gut Pathogens
#11
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 523 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.