↓ Skip to main content

Food taboos: their origins and purposes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 763)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
14 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
294 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
691 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Food taboos: their origins and purposes
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, June 2009
DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-5-18
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victor Benno Meyer-Rochow

Abstract

Food taboos are known from virtually all human societies. Most religions declare certain food items fit and others unfit for human consumption. Dietary rules and regulations may govern particular phases of the human life cycle and may be associated with special events such as menstrual period, pregnancy, childbirth, lactation, and -- in traditional societies -- preparation for the hunt, battle, wedding, funeral, etc. On a comparative basis many food taboos seem to make no sense at all, as to what may be declared unfit by one group may be perfectly acceptable to another. On the other hand, food taboos have a long history and one ought to expect a sound explanation for the existence (and persistence) of certain dietary customs in a given culture. Yet, this is a highly debated view and no single theory may explain why people employ special food taboos. This paper wants to revive interest in food taboo research and attempts a functionalist's explanation. However, to illustrate some of the complexity of possible reasons for food taboo five examples have been chosen, namely traditional food taboos in orthodox Jewish and Hindu societies as well as reports on aspects of dietary restrictions in communities with traditional lifestyles of Malaysia, Papua New Guinea, and Nigeria. An ecological or medical background is apparent for many, including some that are seen as religious or spiritual in origin. On the one hand food taboos can help utilizing a resource more efficiently; on the other food taboos can lead to the protection of a resource. Food taboos, whether scientifically correct or not, are often meant to protect the human individual and the observation, for example, that certain allergies and depression are associated with each other could have led to declaring food items taboo that were identified as causal agents for the allergies. Moreover, any food taboo, acknowledged by a particular group of people as part of its ways, aids in the cohesion of this group, helps that particular group maintain its identity in the face of others, and therefore creates a feeling of "belonging".

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 691 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 679 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 121 18%
Student > Bachelor 99 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 90 13%
Researcher 52 8%
Student > Postgraduate 42 6%
Other 129 19%
Unknown 158 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 117 17%
Social Sciences 91 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 67 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 66 10%
Environmental Science 34 5%
Other 142 21%
Unknown 174 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 97. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2023.
All research outputs
#411,778
of 24,384,616 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#5
of 763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#943
of 115,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,384,616 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.