You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Physician-reported barriers to using evidence-based recommendations for low back pain in clinical practice: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies using the Theoretical Domains Framework
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-019-0884-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amanda M. Hall, Samantha R. Scurrey, Andrea E. Pike, Charlotte Albury, Helen L. Richmond, James Matthews, Elaine Toomey, Jill A. Hayden, Holly Etchegary |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 19% |
| Ireland | 7 | 17% |
| United States | 3 | 7% |
| Canada | 3 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 17 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 62% |
| Scientists | 11 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 173 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 16% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 8% |
| Researcher | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 18% |
| Unknown | 61 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Psychology | 4 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 68 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,179,307
of 25,576,275 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#192
of 1,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,242
of 364,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#10
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,816 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.