You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Which design to evaluate complex interventions? Toward a methodological framework through a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-019-0736-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laetitia Minary, Justine Trompette, Joëlle Kivits, Linda Cambon, Cyril Tarquinio, François Alla |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 28 | 33% |
| United States | 5 | 6% |
| Ireland | 4 | 5% |
| Brazil | 3 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Peru | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 29 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 42% |
| Scientists | 35 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 223 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 20% |
| Researcher | 37 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 11% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Professor | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 35 | 16% |
| Unknown | 65 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 6% |
| Psychology | 10 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 38 | 17% |
| Unknown | 79 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2022.
All research outputs
#836,383
of 25,401,381 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#71
of 2,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,657
of 364,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,401,381 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,281 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.