↓ Skip to main content

High-dose single-fraction IMRT versus fractionated external beam radiotherapy for patients with spinal bone metastases: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High-dose single-fraction IMRT versus fractionated external beam radiotherapy for patients with spinal bone metastases: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13063-015-0761-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harald Rief, Sonja Katayama, Thomas Bruckner, Stefan Rieken, Tilman Bostel, Robert Förster, Ingmar Schlampp, Robert Wolf, Jürgen Debus, Florian Sterzing

Abstract

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) can be a safe modality for treating spinal bone metastasis with enhanced targeting accuracy and an effective method for achieving good tumor control and a rigorous pain response. This is a single-center, prospective randomized controlled trial to evaluate pain relief after RT and consists of two treatment groups with 30 patients in each group. One group will receive single-fraction intensity-modulated RT with 1×24 Gy, and the other will receive fractionated RT with 10×3 Gy. The target parameters will be measured at baseline and at 3 and 6 months after RT. The aim of this study is to evaluate pain relief after RT in patients with spinal bone metastases by means of two different techniques: stereotactic body radiation therapy and fractionated RT. The primary endpoint is pain relief at the 3-month time-point after RT. Secondly, quality of life, fatigue, overall and bone survival, and local control will be assessed. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02358720 (June 2, 2015).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 17%
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 14 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 17 29%