↓ Skip to main content

Income adequacy and education associated with the prevalence of obesity in rural Saskatchewan, Canada

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Income adequacy and education associated with the prevalence of obesity in rural Saskatchewan, Canada
Published in
BMC Public Health, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12889-015-2006-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yue Chen, Donna C. Rennie, Chandima P. Karunanayake, Bonnie Janzen, Louise Hagel, William Pickett, Roland Dyck, Joshua Lawson, James A. Dosman, Punam Pahwa

Abstract

Obesity is prevalent in rural communities in Canada, however little is known about the social determinants of health and obesity in rural populations. Socioeconomic status has been found to be inversely associated with the risk of obesity in developed countries. This study investigated the relationship between income adequacy, education and obesity in a rural setting. The study used data from 5391 adults aged 18-69 who participated in the Saskatchewan Rural Health Study in 2010. Participants completed a survey that included questions about location of residence, body weight, height, and socio-demographic and behavioral factors. Obesity was defined as body mass index being ≥ 30 kg/m(2). Logistic regression using generalized estimating equation was conducted to assess the associations of income adequacy and education level with the prevalence of obesity taking covariates into consideration. Approximately a third of the participants were obese and the prevalence of obesity was similar for men and women. The prevalence of obesity was significantly higher for rural residents not living on farm compared with those living on farm (p < 0.05). After adjustment for potential confounders, the risk of obesity was increased for those with ≤ 12 years of education compared with those with > 12 years of education (aOR: 1.18; 95 % CI: 1.05 - 1.34). Low income adequacy was significantly associated with an increased risk of obesity but only among those not living on farm (aOR: 1.80; 95 % CI: 1.16 - 2.79). Home location was associated with obesity prevalence in rural Saskatchewan and modified the influence of income adequacy, but not the influence of education, on obesity. Adults not living on farm had an increased risk of obesity and showed a significant impact of income adequacy on obesity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Taiwan 1 2%
Unknown 61 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 18%
Student > Bachelor 10 16%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 15 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 15%
Social Sciences 7 11%
Sports and Recreations 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 18 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2016.
All research outputs
#13,766,674
of 22,852,911 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,936
of 14,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,994
of 263,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#184
of 277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,852,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.