↓ Skip to main content

Improvement in detection of minor alleles in next generation sequencing by base quality recalibration

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improvement in detection of minor alleles in next generation sequencing by base quality recalibration
Published in
BMC Genomics, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12864-016-2463-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shengyu Ni, Mark Stoneking

Abstract

Minor allele detection in very high coverage sequence data (>1000X) has many applications such as detecting mtDNA heteroplasmy, somatic mutations in cancer or tumors, SNP calling in pool sequencing, etc., where reads with low frequency are not necessarily sequence error but may instead convey biological information. However, the suitability of common base quality recalibration tools for such applications has not been investigated in detail. We show that the widely used tool GATK BaseRecalibration has several limitations in minor allele detection. First, GATK IndelRealignment fails to work if the sequence coverage is above a certain level since it then becomes computationally infeasible. Second, the accuracy of the base quality largely depends on the database of known SNPs as the control, which limits the ability of de novo minor allele detection. Third, GATK reduces the base quality of sequence errors at the cost of reducing scores for true minor alleles. To overcome these limitations, we present a novel approach called SEGREG, which applies segmented regression to control sequences (e.g. phiX174 DNA) spiked into a sequencing run. Based on simulations SEGREG improves both the accuracy of base quality scores and the detection of minor alleles. We further investigate sequence error and recalibration parameters by applying a Logarithm Likelihood Ratio (LLR) approach to SEGREG recalibrated base quality scores for phiX174 DNA sequenced to very high coverage, and for mtDNA genome sequences previously analyzed for heteroplasmic variants. Our results suggest that SEGREG improves base recalibration without suffering the limitations discussed above, and the LLR approach benefits from SEGREG in identifying more true minor alleles, while avoiding false positives from sequencing error.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
France 1 3%
Switzerland 1 3%
Unknown 32 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 29%
Researcher 8 23%
Other 5 14%
Professor 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 20%
Computer Science 7 20%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2016.
All research outputs
#6,745,601
of 24,862,067 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#2,675
of 11,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,755
of 303,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#59
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,862,067 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,092 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.