↓ Skip to main content

What helped and hindered implementation of an intervention package to reduce smoking in pregnancy: process evaluation guided by normalization process theory

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
19 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What helped and hindered implementation of an intervention package to reduce smoking in pregnancy: process evaluation guided by normalization process theory
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, May 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12913-019-4122-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan Jones, Sharon Hamilton, Ruth Bell, Vera Araújo-Soares, Svetlana V. Glinianaia, Eugene M. G. Milne, Martin White, Martyn Willmore, Janet Shucksmith

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 19%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 22 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 13%
Psychology 6 7%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 24 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,993,453
of 25,307,332 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#714
of 8,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,292
of 357,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#18
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,307,332 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.