You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating Augmented Depression Therapy (ADepT): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40814-019-0438-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Barnaby D. Dunn, Emily Widnall, Nigel Reed, Rod Taylor, Christabel Owens, Anne Spencer, Gerda Kraag, Gerjo Kok, Nicole Geschwind, Kim Wright, Nicholas J. Moberly, Michelle L. Moulds, Andrew K. MacLeod, Rachel Handley, David Richards, John Campbell, Willem Kuyken |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 80% |
| South Africa | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 90 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 20% |
| Unknown | 25 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 38 | 42% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 28 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,793,802
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#155
of 1,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,250
of 364,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#7
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.