↓ Skip to main content

Early father-infant skin-to-skin contact and its effect on the neurodevelopmental outcomes of moderately preterm infants in China: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
333 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early father-infant skin-to-skin contact and its effect on the neurodevelopmental outcomes of moderately preterm infants in China: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13063-018-3060-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qingqi Deng, Qiufang Li, Hua Wang, Huilian Sun, Xinfen Xu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 333 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 333 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 13%
Student > Bachelor 39 12%
Researcher 31 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 8%
Student > Postgraduate 20 6%
Other 52 16%
Unknown 123 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 61 18%
Psychology 31 9%
Neuroscience 14 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 3%
Other 26 8%
Unknown 131 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,028,760
of 22,156,439 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#666
of 5,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,930
of 290,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,156,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them