You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Accelerometer-derived physical activity estimation in preschoolers – comparison of cut-point sets incorporating the vector magnitude vs the vertical axis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-019-6837-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claudia S. Leeger-Aschmann, Einat A. Schmutz, Annina E. Zysset, Tanja H. Kakebeeke, Nadine Messerli-Bürgy, Kerstin Stülb, Amar Arhab, Andrea H. Meyer, Simone Munsch, Oskar G. Jenni, Jardena J. Puder, Susi Kriemler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 25 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 14 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 32 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2020.
All research outputs
#17,363,471
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#13,242
of 17,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,748
of 367,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#285
of 362 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 362 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.