↓ Skip to main content

Discrete distributional differential expression (D3E) - a tool for gene expression analysis of single-cell RNA-seq data

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Discrete distributional differential expression (D3E) - a tool for gene expression analysis of single-cell RNA-seq data
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12859-016-0944-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mihails Delmans, Martin Hemberg

Abstract

The advent of high throughput RNA-seq at the single-cell level has opened up new opportunities to elucidate the heterogeneity of gene expression. One of the most widespread applications of RNA-seq is to identify genes which are differentially expressed between two experimental conditions. We present a discrete, distributional method for differential gene expression (D(3)E), a novel algorithm specifically designed for single-cell RNA-seq data. We use synthetic data to evaluate D(3)E, demonstrating that it can detect changes in expression, even when the mean level remains unchanged. Since D(3)E is based on an analytically tractable stochastic model, it provides additional biological insights by quantifying biologically meaningful properties, such as the average burst size and frequency. We use D(3)E to investigate experimental data, and with the help of the underlying model, we directly test hypotheses about the driving mechanism behind changes in gene expression. Evaluation using synthetic data shows that D(3)E performs better than other methods for identifying differentially expressed genes since it is designed to take full advantage of the information available from single-cell RNA-seq experiments. Moreover, the analytical model underlying D(3)E makes it possible to gain additional biological insights.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 2 1%
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 150 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 24%
Student > Master 18 11%
Other 10 6%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 19 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 24%
Computer Science 13 8%
Mathematics 10 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 22 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2017.
All research outputs
#4,322,369
of 24,598,501 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#1,538
of 7,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,079
of 302,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#33
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,598,501 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,559 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.