You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evolution of plant genome architecture
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-016-0908-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan F. Wendel, Scott A. Jackson, Blake C. Meyers, Rod A. Wing |
| Abstract |
We have witnessed an explosion in our understanding of the evolution and structure of plant genomes in recent years. Here, we highlight three important emergent realizations: (1) that the evolutionary history of all plant genomes contains multiple, cyclical episodes of whole-genome doubling that were followed by myriad fractionation processes; (2) that the vast majority of the variation in genome size reflects the dynamics of proliferation and loss of lineage-specific transposable elements; and (3) that various classes of small RNAs help shape genomic architecture and function. We illustrate ways in which understanding these organism-level and molecular genetic processes can be used for crop plant improvement. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 16% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 28 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 19 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 611 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Norway | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Russia | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 590 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 138 | 23% |
| Researcher | 130 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 65 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 28 | 5% |
| Other | 97 | 16% |
| Unknown | 107 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 311 | 51% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 135 | 22% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 2% |
| Unknown | 131 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2023.
All research outputs
#998,884
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#711
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,009
of 312,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#9
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.