↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) supplement in management of constipation among nursing home residents

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy of Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) supplement in management of constipation among nursing home residents
Published in
Nutrition Journal, February 2010
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-9-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hyang Mi An, Eun Hye Baek, Seok Jang, Do Kyung Lee, Mi Jin Kim, Jung Rae Kim, Kang Oh Lee, Jong Gi Park, Nam Joo Ha

Abstract

Constipation is a significant problem in the elderly, specifically nursing home and/or extended-care facility residents are reported to suffer from constipation. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are beneficial probiotic organisms that contribute to improved nutrition, microbial balance, and immuno-enhancement of the intestinal tract, as well as diarrhea and constipation effect. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of this LAB supplement in the management of nursing home residents.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 107 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 19%
Student > Master 13 12%
Researcher 10 9%
Other 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Other 28 26%
Unknown 20 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 9%
Chemistry 3 3%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 19 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,194,509
of 23,947,581 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#903
of 1,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,287
of 170,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,947,581 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.6. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.