You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Treatment outcomes of adult patients with recurrent tuberculosis in relation to HIV status in Zimbabwe: a retrospective record review
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, February 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-124 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kudakwashe C Takarinda, Anthony D Harries, Satyanarayana Srinath, Tsitsi Mutasa-Apollo, Charles Sandy, Owen Mugurungi |
Abstract |
Zimbabwe is a Southern African country with a high HIV-TB burden and is ranked 19th among the 22 Tuberculosis high burden countries worldwide. Recurrent TB is an important problem for TB control, yet there is limited information about treatment outcomes in relation to HIV status. This study was therefore conducted in Chitungwiza, a high density dormitory town outside the capital city, to determine in adults registered with recurrent TB how treatment outcomes were affected by type of recurrence and HIV status. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Zimbabwe | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 125 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 36 | 28% |
Researcher | 20 | 15% |
Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 6% |
Other | 24 | 18% |
Unknown | 19 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 45% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 4% |
Other | 18 | 14% |
Unknown | 23 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2017.
All research outputs
#6,371,272
of 23,504,694 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,577
of 15,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,740
of 253,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#70
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,504,694 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.