↓ Skip to main content

Misperceptions of "light" cigarettes abound: National survey data

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Misperceptions of "light" cigarettes abound: National survey data
Published in
BMC Public Health, May 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-9-126
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nick Wilson, Deepa Weerasekera, Jo Peace, Richard Edwards, George Thomson, Miranda Devlin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Master 5 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 11%
Other 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 11 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2023.
All research outputs
#8,060,552
of 24,216,270 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,516
of 15,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,207
of 95,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#23
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,216,270 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.