↓ Skip to main content

Draft genome sequences of Pantoea agglomerans and Pantoea vagans isolates associated with termites

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Microbiome, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Draft genome sequences of Pantoea agglomerans and Pantoea vagans isolates associated with termites
Published in
Environmental Microbiome, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40793-016-0144-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marike Palmer, Pieter de Maayer, Michael Poulsen, Emma T. Steenkamp, Elritha van Zyl, Teresa A. Coutinho, Stephanus N. Venter

Abstract

The genus Pantoea incorporates many economically and clinically important species. The plant-associated species, Pantoea agglomerans and Pantoea vagans, are closely related and are often isolated from similar environments. Plasmids conferring certain metabolic capabilities are also shared amongst these two species. The genomes of two isolates obtained from fungus-growing termites in South Africa were sequenced, assembled and annotated. A high number of orthologous genes are conserved within and between these species. The difference in genome size between P. agglomerans MP2 (4,733,829 bp) and P. vagans MP7 (4,598,703 bp) can largely be attributed to the differences in plasmid content. The genome sequences of these isolates may shed light on the common traits that enable P. agglomerans and P. vagans to co-occur in plant- and insect-associated niches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 52 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 24%
Researcher 10 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 6%
Engineering 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 8 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2016.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Microbiome
#493
of 786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,485
of 312,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Microbiome
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 786 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.