You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genomic approaches for understanding dengue: insights from the virus, vector, and host
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-016-0907-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shuzhen Sim, Martin L. Hibberd |
| Abstract |
The incidence and geographic range of dengue have increased dramatically in recent decades. Climate change, rapid urbanization and increased global travel have facilitated the spread of both efficient mosquito vectors and the four dengue virus serotypes between population centers. At the same time, significant advances in genomics approaches have provided insights into host-pathogen interactions, immunogenetics, and viral evolution in both humans and mosquitoes. Here, we review these advances and the innovative treatment and control strategies that they are inspiring. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Singapore | 2 | 11% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Argentina | 1 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 50% |
| Scientists | 7 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 268 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 257 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 16% |
| Researcher | 40 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 22 | 8% |
| Other | 36 | 13% |
| Unknown | 54 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 61 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 52 | 19% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 28 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 10% |
| Engineering | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 30 | 11% |
| Unknown | 63 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2016.
All research outputs
#2,073,690
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,754
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,710
of 312,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#34
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.