↓ Skip to main content

Regulation of immunity during visceral Leishmania infection

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
377 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Regulation of immunity during visceral Leishmania infection
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13071-016-1412-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vasco Rodrigues, Anabela Cordeiro-da-Silva, Mireille Laforge, Ricardo Silvestre, Jérôme Estaquier

Abstract

Unicellular eukaryotes of the genus Leishmania are collectively responsible for a heterogeneous group of diseases known as leishmaniasis. The visceral form of leishmaniasis, caused by L. donovani or L. infantum, is a devastating condition, claiming 20,000 to 40,000 lives annually, with particular incidence in some of the poorest regions of the world. Immunity to Leishmania depends on the development of protective type I immune responses capable of activating infected phagocytes to kill intracellular amastigotes. However, despite the induction of protective responses, disease progresses due to a multitude of factors that impede an optimal response. These include the action of suppressive cytokines, exhaustion of specific T cells, loss of lymphoid tissue architecture and a defective humoral response. We will review how these responses are orchestrated during the course of infection, including both early and chronic stages, focusing on the spleen and the liver, which are the main target organs of visceral Leishmania in the host. A comprehensive understanding of the immune events that occur during visceral Leishmania infection is crucial for the implementation of immunotherapeutic approaches that complement the current anti-Leishmania chemotherapy and the development of effective vaccines to prevent disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 377 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Unknown 370 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 70 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 14%
Student > Bachelor 53 14%
Researcher 33 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 8%
Other 51 14%
Unknown 85 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 74 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 65 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 52 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 14 4%
Other 35 9%
Unknown 100 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2018.
All research outputs
#5,614,067
of 22,852,911 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#1,164
of 5,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,078
of 298,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#29
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,852,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.