You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Forms of benefit sharing in global health research undertaken in resource poor settings: a qualitative study of stakeholders' views in Kenya
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1747-5341-7-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Geoffrey M Lairumbi, Michael Parker, Raymond Fitzpatrick, Michael C English |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Kenya | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Sierra Leone | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 14% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 24% |
| Unknown | 11 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 20% |
| Unknown | 18 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2012.
All research outputs
#4,365,514
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
#112
of 236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,486
of 256,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.