You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Opportunities and challenges for an Indonesian forest monitoring network
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Forest Science , May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13595-019-0840-0 |
| Authors |
Francis Q. Brearley, Wahyu C. Adinugroho, Rodrigo Cámara-Leret, Haruni Krisnawati, Alicia Ledo, Lan Qie, Thomas E. L. Smith, Fitri Aini, Fabien Garnier, Nurul S. Lestari, Muhammad Mansur, Agustinus Murdjoko, Satria Oktarita, Emma Soraya, Hesti Lestari Tata, Tatang Tiryana, Liam A. Trethowan, Charlotte E. Wheeler, Muhammad Abdullah, Aswandi, Benjamin J. W. Buckley, Elena Cantarello, Iswan Dunggio, Hendra Gunawan, Charlie D. Heatubun, Diah Irawati Dwi Arini, Istomo, Tajudin Edy Komar, Relawan Kuswandi, Zaenal Mutaqien, Sunitha R. Pangala, Ramadhanil, Prayoto, Antun Puspanti, Muhammad A. Qirom, Andes H. Rozak, Asep Sadili, Ismayadi Samsoedin, Endah Sulistyawati, Siti Sundari, Sutomo, Agustinus P. Tampubolon, Campbell O. Webb |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 29% |
| United States | 5 | 10% |
| Thailand | 3 | 6% |
| Germany | 3 | 6% |
| Indonesia | 3 | 6% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 65% |
| Scientists | 16 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 25% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 11% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 5 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 19% |
| Unknown | 24 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 24 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 23 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,138,317
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Forest Science
#10
of 942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,470
of 365,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Forest Science
#1
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.