↓ Skip to main content

Spinal correction of scoliosis in Jeune syndrome: a report of two cases

Overview of attention for article published in Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spinal correction of scoliosis in Jeune syndrome: a report of two cases
Published in
Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13013-016-0069-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wataru Saito, Gen Inoue, Takayuki Imura, Toshiyuki Nakazawa, Masayuki Miyagi, Takanori Namba, Eiki Shirasawa, Naonobu Takahira, Masashi Takaso

Abstract

Jeune syndrome (asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy) is an autosomal recessive disorder with constriction and narrowing of the thorax. To our knowledge, there are no reports regarding spinal deformity and correction in Jeune syndrome. Herein, we report two cases of spinal correction in patients with Jeune syndrome, and review the literature. We experienced cases of spinal scoliosis in an adolescent boy and a young adult woman, both with Jeune syndrome. Their spinal deformities had progressed by the time they came to our hospital for surgical correction. After preoperative evaluation of their general condition, including respiratory function in detail to confirm that they could undergo surgery, we treated both cases with posterior spinal correction and fusion. Spinal correction was performed safely and there were no severe complications, including respiratory depression, associated with surgery, and relatively satisfactory correction was obtained in both cases. In case 1, coronal deformity was corrected from 70° to 36° and from 82° to 42°, respectively. In case 2, Cobb angle was corrected from 52° to 20° and from 55° to 21°. Posterior spinal correction can be performed safely in young patients with Jeune syndrome who have survived their infant stage and matured without a severe general condition.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 18%
Researcher 2 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 35%
Sports and Recreations 2 12%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Materials Science 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2016.
All research outputs
#20,311,744
of 22,852,911 outputs
Outputs from Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders
#91
of 97 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,105
of 298,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,852,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.