↓ Skip to main content

Antagonistic experimental coevolution with a parasite increases host recombination frequency

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antagonistic experimental coevolution with a parasite increases host recombination frequency
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-12-18
Pubmed ID
Authors

Niels AG Kerstes, Camillo Bérénos, Paul Schmid-Hempel, K Mathias Wegner

Abstract

One of the big remaining challenges in evolutionary biology is to understand the evolution and maintenance of meiotic recombination. As recombination breaks down successful genotypes, it should be selected for only under very limited conditions. Yet, recombination is very common and phylogenetically widespread. The Red Queen Hypothesis is one of the most prominent hypotheses for the adaptive value of recombination and sexual reproduction. The Red Queen Hypothesis predicts an advantage of recombination for hosts that are coevolving with their parasites. We tested predictions of the hypothesis with experimental coevolution using the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum, and its microsporidian parasite, Nosema whitei.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 4%
Germany 3 3%
Canada 2 2%
Sweden 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 94 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 35%
Researcher 21 20%
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 5 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 76 71%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 5%
Environmental Science 4 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 6 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,806,143
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#434
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,894
of 257,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#6
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.