↓ Skip to main content

Review and classification of variability analysis techniques with clinical applications

Overview of attention for article published in BioMedical Engineering OnLine, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
6 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
200 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
387 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Review and classification of variability analysis techniques with clinical applications
Published in
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1475-925x-10-90
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Bravi, André Longtin, Andrew JE Seely

Abstract

Analysis of patterns of variation of time-series, termed variability analysis, represents a rapidly evolving discipline with increasing applications in different fields of science. In medicine and in particular critical care, efforts have focussed on evaluating the clinical utility of variability. However, the growth and complexity of techniques applicable to this field have made interpretation and understanding of variability more challenging. Our objective is to provide an updated review of variability analysis techniques suitable for clinical applications. We review more than 70 variability techniques, providing for each technique a brief description of the underlying theory and assumptions, together with a summary of clinical applications. We propose a revised classification for the domains of variability techniques, which include statistical, geometric, energetic, informational, and invariant. We discuss the process of calculation, often necessitating a mathematical transform of the time-series. Our aims are to summarize a broad literature, promote a shared vocabulary that would improve the exchange of ideas, and the analyses of the results between different studies. We conclude with challenges for the evolving science of variability analysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 387 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 3%
Germany 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 359 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 83 21%
Student > Master 68 18%
Researcher 58 15%
Student > Bachelor 27 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 6%
Other 83 21%
Unknown 45 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 68 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 61 16%
Sports and Recreations 29 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 7%
Psychology 28 7%
Other 98 25%
Unknown 74 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2022.
All research outputs
#3,222,333
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#64
of 867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,004
of 148,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.