You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
| Title |
Sources of variation in false discovery rate estimation include sample size, correlation, and inherent differences between groups
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-13-s13-s1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jiexin Zhang, Kevin R Coombes |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 28% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 34% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 21% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |