↓ Skip to main content

Aurora kinase A in gastrointestinal cancers: time to target

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Cancer, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aurora kinase A in gastrointestinal cancers: time to target
Published in
Molecular Cancer, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12943-015-0375-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ahmed Katsha, Abbes Belkhiri, Laura Goff, Wael El-Rifai

Abstract

Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are a major cause of cancer-related deaths. During the last two decades, several studies have shown amplification and overexpression of Aurora kinase A (AURKA) in several GI malignancies. These studies demonstrated that AURKA not only plays a role in regulating cell cycle and mitosis, but also regulates a number of key oncogenic signaling pathways. Although AURKA inhibitors have moved to phase III clinical trials in lymphomas, there has been slower progress in GI cancers and solid tumors. Ongoing clinical trials testing AURKA inhibitors as a single agent or in combination with conventional chemotherapies are expected to provide important clinical information for targeting AURKA in GI cancers. It is, therefore, imperative to consider investigations of molecular determinants of response and resistance to this class of inhibitors. This will improve evaluation of the efficacy of these drugs and establish biomarker based strategies for enrollment into clinical trials, which hold the future direction for personalized cancer therapy. In this review, we will discuss the available data on AURKA in GI cancers. We will also summarize the major AURKA inhibitors that have been developed and tested in pre-clinical and clinical settings.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Unknown 72 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 18%
Chemistry 4 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 14 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2019.
All research outputs
#7,475,259
of 22,852,911 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Cancer
#547
of 1,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,756
of 266,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Cancer
#12
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,852,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,722 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.