You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
GenePy - a score for estimating gene pathogenicity in individuals using next-generation sequencing data
BMC Bioinformatics, May 2019
E. Mossotto, J. J. Ashton, L. O’Gorman, R. J. Pengelly, R. M. Beattie, B. D. MacArthur, S. Ennis
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||2||25%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||12||17%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||12||17%|
|Student > Bachelor||8||12%|
|Student > Postgraduate||4||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||19||28%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||12||17%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||6||9%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2019.
All research outputs
of 23,344,526 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
of 7,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 352,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,344,526 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,387 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.