↓ Skip to main content

Recommended practices for computerized clinical decision support and knowledge management in community settings: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recommended practices for computerized clinical decision support and knowledge management in community settings: a qualitative study
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-12-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joan S Ash, Dean F Sittig, Kenneth P Guappone, Richard H Dykstra, Joshua Richardson, Adam Wright, James Carpenter, Carmit McMullen, Michael Shapiro, Arwen Bunce, Blackford Middleton

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify recommended practices for computerized clinical decision support (CDS) development and implementation and for knowledge management (KM) processes in ambulatory clinics and community hospitals using commercial or locally developed systems in the U.S.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 2%
United States 3 2%
Spain 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 169 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 24%
Researcher 28 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Other 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 40 22%
Unknown 25 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 33%
Computer Science 25 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 11%
Psychology 13 7%
Social Sciences 11 6%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 27 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2013.
All research outputs
#3,235,298
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#263
of 2,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,814
of 254,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,025 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.