↓ Skip to main content

BLANNOTATOR: enhanced homology-based function prediction of bacterial proteins

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
BLANNOTATOR: enhanced homology-based function prediction of bacterial proteins
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-13-33
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matti Kankainen, Teija Ojala, Liisa Holm

Abstract

Automated function prediction has played a central role in determining the biological functions of bacterial proteins. Typically, protein function annotation relies on homology, and function is inferred from other proteins with similar sequences. This approach has become popular in bacterial genomics because it is one of the few methods that is practical for large datasets and because it does not require additional functional genomics experiments. However, the existing solutions produce erroneous predictions in many cases, especially when query sequences have low levels of identity with the annotated source protein. This problem has created a pressing need for improvements in homology-based annotation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 8%
Brazil 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Slovenia 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 51 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 21%
Computer Science 5 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 5 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2012.
All research outputs
#15,708,425
of 23,344,526 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#5,490
of 7,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,346
of 253,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#53
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,344,526 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,387 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.