You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
HealthWorks: results of a multi-component group-randomized worksite environmental intervention trial for weight gain prevention
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5868-9-14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer A Linde, Katherine E Nygaard, Richard F MacLehose, Nathan R Mitchell, Lisa J Harnack, Julie M Cousins, Daniel J Graham, Robert W Jeffery |
| Abstract |
U.S. adults are at unprecedented risk of becoming overweight or obese, and most scientists believe the primary cause is an obesogenic environment. Worksites provide an opportunity to shape the environments of adults to reduce obesity risk. The goal of this group-randomized trial was to implement a four-component environmental intervention at the worksite level to positively influence weight gain among employees over a two-year period. Environmental components focused on food availability and price, physical activity promotion, scale access, and media enhancements. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Georgia | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 236 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 51 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 9% |
| Researcher | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 42 | 18% |
| Unknown | 54 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 31 | 13% |
| Psychology | 20 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 14% |
| Unknown | 67 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#6,496,331
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,499
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,888
of 167,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#12
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.