↓ Skip to main content

Differences in gene expression and cytokine production by crystalline vs. amorphous silica in human lung epithelial cells

Overview of attention for article published in Particle and Fibre Toxicology, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differences in gene expression and cytokine production by crystalline vs. amorphous silica in human lung epithelial cells
Published in
Particle and Fibre Toxicology, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/1743-8977-9-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy N Perkins, Arti Shukla, Paul M Peeters, Jeremy L Steinbacher, Christopher C Landry, Sherrill A Lathrop, Chad Steele, Niki L Reynaert, Emiel FM Wouters, Brooke T Mossman

Abstract

Exposure to respirable crystalline silica particles, as opposed to amorphous silica, is associated with lung inflammation, pulmonary fibrosis (silicosis), and potentially with lung cancer. We used Affymetrix/GeneSifter microarray analysis to determine whether gene expression profiles differed in a human bronchial epithelial cell line (BEAS 2B) exposed to cristobalite vs. amorphous silica particles at non-toxic and equal surface areas (75 and 150 × 106μm2/cm2). Bio-Plex analysis was also used to determine profiles of secreted cytokines and chemokines in response to both particles. Finally, primary human bronchial epithelial cells (NHBE) were used to comparatively assess silica particle-induced alterations in gene expression.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 63 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 22%
Student > Master 11 16%
Researcher 8 12%
Other 6 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 12 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 7%
Chemistry 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 14 20%