You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
An evaluation of edge effects in nutritional accessibility and availability measures: a simulation study
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Health Geographics, January 2010
|
DOI | 10.1186/1476-072x-9-40 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Emily M Van Meter, Andrew B Lawson, Natalie Colabianchi, Michele Nichols, James Hibbert, Dwayne E Porter, Angela D Liese |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 2% |
Poland | 1 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 37 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 17% |
Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
Unspecified | 4 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 17% |
Unknown | 7 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 7 | 17% |
Unspecified | 5 | 12% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 7% |
Engineering | 3 | 7% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 20% |
Unknown | 12 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,794,137
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Geographics
#132
of 629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,044
of 164,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Geographics
#6
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.