↓ Skip to main content

Social autopsy: INDEPTH Network experiences of utility, process, practices, and challenges in investigating causes and contributors to mortality

Overview of attention for article published in Population Health Metrics, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social autopsy: INDEPTH Network experiences of utility, process, practices, and challenges in investigating causes and contributors to mortality
Published in
Population Health Metrics, August 2011
DOI 10.1186/1478-7954-9-44
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karin Källander, Daniel Kadobera, Thomas N Williams, Rikke Thoft Nielsen, Lucy Yevoo, Aloysius Mutebi, Jonas Akpakli, Clement Narh, Margaret Gyapong, Alberta Amu, Peter Waiswa

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 132 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 18%
Student > Master 25 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 4%
Other 26 19%
Unknown 23 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 37%
Social Sciences 27 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 25 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,593,064
of 23,148,322 outputs
Outputs from Population Health Metrics
#213
of 392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,618
of 120,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Population Health Metrics
#7
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,148,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.