You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
| Title |
Debate: Are surrogate end-point studies worth the effort?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, September 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cvm-1-2-072 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan Valabhji, Robert S Elkeles |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 40% |
| Professor | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 60% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 20% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 20% |