You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The revised ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT diagnostic criteria for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) - practical implications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Respiratory Research, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1465-9921-14-s1-s2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Athol U Wells |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 148 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 17% |
| Other | 24 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 30 | 20% |
| Unknown | 23 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 96 | 64% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Unknown | 25 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2021.
All research outputs
#5,448,088
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#694
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,553
of 194,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#14
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.