Title |
A pilot study to compare the detection of HPV-16 biomarkers in salivary oral rinses with tumour p16INK4a expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Cancer, March 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12885-016-2217-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ryan C. Chai, Yenkai Lim, Ian H. Frazer, Yunxia Wan, Christopher Perry, Lee Jones, Duncan Lambie, Chamindie Punyadeera |
Abstract |
Human papilloma virus-16 (HPV-16) infection is a major risk factor for a subset of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), in particular oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Current techniques for assessing the HPV-16 status in HNSCC include the detection of HPV-16 DNA and p16(INK4a) expression in tumor tissues. When tumors originate from hidden anatomical sites, this method can be challenging. A non-invasive and cost-effective alternative to biopsy is therefore desirable for HPV-16 detection especially within a community setting to screen at-risk individuals. The present study compared detection of HPV-16 DNA and RNA in salivary oral rinses with tumor p16(INK4a) status, in 82 HNSCC patients using end-point and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Of 42 patients with p16(INK4a)-positive tumours, 39 (sensitivity = 92.9 %, PPV = 100 % and NPV = 93 %) had oral rinse samples with detectable HPV-16 DNA, using end-point and quantitative PCR. No HPV-16 DNA was detected in oral rinse samples from 40 patients with p16(INK4a) negative tumours, yielding a test specificity of 100 %. For patients with p16(INK4a) positive tumours, HPV-16 mRNA was detected using end-point reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) in 24/40 (sensitivity = 60 %, PPV = 100 % and NPV = 71 %), and using quantitative RT-PCR in 22/40 (sensitivity = 55 %, PPV = 100 % and NPV = 69 %). No HPV-16 mRNA was detected in oral rinse samples from the p16(INK4a)-negative patients, yielding a specificity of 100 %. We demonstrate that the detection of HPV-16 DNA in salivary oral rinse is indicative of HPV status in HNSCC patients and can potentially be used as a diagnostic tool in addition to the current methods. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chile | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 90 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 15% |
Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
Researcher | 10 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
Other | 16 | 18% |
Unknown | 23 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 38% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
Engineering | 3 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 3% |
Unknown | 31 | 34% |