You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comprehensive evaluation of SNP identification with the Restriction Enzyme-based Reduced Representation Library (RRL) method
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-13-77 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ye Du, Hui Jiang, Ying Chen, Cong Li, Meiru Zhao, Jinghua Wu, Yong Qiu, Qibin Li, Xiuqing Zhang |
| Abstract |
Restriction Enzyme-based Reduced Representation Library (RRL) method represents a relatively feasible and flexible strategy used for Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) identification in different species. It has remarkable advantage of reducing the complexity of the genome by orders of magnitude. However, comprehensive evaluation for actual efficacy of SNP identification by this method is still unavailable. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 27% |
| Researcher | 14 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 58% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2014.
All research outputs
#6,749,908
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,058
of 10,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,079
of 155,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#25
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,613 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.