You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction for chemotherapeutic drug delivery to solid tumors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Therapeutic Ultrasound, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2050-5736-1-10 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hong Chen, Joo Ha Hwang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Brunei Darussalam | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 107 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 32 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 27 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,121,735
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Therapeutic Ultrasound
#11
of 80 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,746
of 206,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Therapeutic Ultrasound
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 80 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them