You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Extracellular vesicles from regenerative human cardiac cells act as potent immune modulators by priming monocytes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-019-0504-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christien M. Beez, Marion Haag, Oliver Klein, Sophie Van Linthout, Michael Sittinger, Martina Seifert |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| Finland | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Germany | 1 | 9% |
| South Africa | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 91% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 16 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 6% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2019.
All research outputs
#6,094,777
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#207
of 1,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,065
of 353,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#4
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,613 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.