↓ Skip to main content

Synthetic osteogenic extracellular matrix formed by coated silicon dioxide nanosprings

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nanobiotechnology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Synthetic osteogenic extracellular matrix formed by coated silicon dioxide nanosprings
Published in
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1477-3155-10-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jamie L Hass, Erin M Garrison, Sarah A Wicher, Ben Knapp, Nathan Bridges, DN Mcllroy, Gustavo Arrizabalaga

Abstract

The design of biomimetic materials that parallel the morphology and biology of extracellular matrixes is key to the ability to grow functional tissues in vitro and to enhance the integration of biomaterial implants into existing tissues in vivo. Special attention has been put into mimicking the nanostructures of the extracellular matrix of bone, as there is a need to find biomaterials that can enhance the bonding between orthopedic devices and this tissue.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 23%
Student > Master 3 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Other 2 9%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 4 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 14%
Chemistry 3 14%
Chemical Engineering 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2012.
All research outputs
#15,169,949
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#524
of 1,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,082
of 252,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,919 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.