You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Long short-term memory for a model-free estimation of macronutrient ion concentrations of root-zone in closed-loop soilless cultures
|
---|---|
Published in |
Plant Methods, May 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13007-019-0443-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Taewon Moon, Tae In Ahn, Jung Eek Son |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 18% |
Researcher | 5 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 11 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 7 | 21% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 15% |
Engineering | 4 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Psychology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 12 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2019.
All research outputs
#18,683,314
of 23,149,216 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#968
of 1,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,747
of 350,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#36
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,149,216 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,096 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.