↓ Skip to main content

Propolis: a new frontier for wound healing?

Overview of attention for article published in Burns & Trauma, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 304)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
153 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
366 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Propolis: a new frontier for wound healing?
Published in
Burns & Trauma, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s41038-015-0010-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simona Martinotti, Elia Ranzato

Abstract

Propolis is a resin produced by honeybees by mixing wax, pollen, salivary secretions, and collected natural resins. The precise composition of propolis varies with the source, and over 300 chemical components belonging to the flavonoids, terpenes, and phenolic acids have been identified in propolis. Moreover, its chemical composition is subjected to the geographical location, botanical origin, and bee species. Propolis and its compounds have been the focus of many works due to their antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activity; however, it is now recognized that propolis also possesses regenerative properties. There is an increasing interest in the healing potential of natural products, considering the availability and low cost of these products. Propolis contains a huge number of compounds that explicate some biological effects that speeds up the healing process and is widely used in folk remedies. This review aims to condense the results on the mechanism of activity of propolis and its compounds.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 366 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 366 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 63 17%
Student > Master 36 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Other 12 3%
Other 50 14%
Unknown 161 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 30 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 6%
Chemistry 21 6%
Other 45 12%
Unknown 177 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,104,041
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Burns & Trauma
#10
of 304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,533
of 275,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Burns & Trauma
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them