↓ Skip to main content

Hazards to avoid in future neonatal studies of nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation: lessons from an early terminated trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hazards to avoid in future neonatal studies of nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation: lessons from an early terminated trial
Published in
BMC Research Notes, April 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13104-019-4268-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hendrik S. Fischer, Christoph Bührer, Christoph Czernik

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Other 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 13 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Unspecified 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Unknown 14 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2019.
All research outputs
#18,683,314
of 23,149,216 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#3,040
of 4,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,271
of 350,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#74
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,149,216 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.