↓ Skip to main content

Does partial expander deflation exacerbate the adverse effects of radiotherapy in two-stage breast reconstruction?

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgical Oncology, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does partial expander deflation exacerbate the adverse effects of radiotherapy in two-stage breast reconstruction?
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/1477-7819-10-44
Pubmed ID
Authors

Burcu Celet Ozden, Erdem Guven, Isik Aslay, Gonul Kemikler, Vakur Olgac, Merva Soluk Tekkesin, Bengul Serarslan, Burcak Tumerdem Ulug, Aylin Bilgin Karabulut, Atilla Arinci, Ufuk Emekli

Abstract

The optimum protocol for expander volume adjustment with respect to the timing and application of radiotherapy remains controversial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 25%
Student > Bachelor 5 18%
Other 3 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2012.
All research outputs
#18,304,874
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#1,025
of 2,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,776
of 156,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#21
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,038 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.