↓ Skip to main content

An integrated workplace mental health intervention in a policing context: Protocol for a cluster randomised control trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
259 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An integrated workplace mental health intervention in a policing context: Protocol for a cluster randomised control trial
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12888-016-0741-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony D. LaMontagne, Allison J. Milner, Amanda F. Allisey, Kathryn M. Page, Nicola J. Reavley, Angela Martin, Irina Tchernitskaia, Andrew J. Noblet, Lauren J. Purnell, Katrina Witt, Tessa G. Keegel, Peter M. Smith

Abstract

In this paper, we present the protocol for a cluster-randomised trial to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of a workplace mental health intervention in the state-wide police department of the south-eastern Australian state of Victoria. n. The primary aims of the intervention are to improve psychosocial working conditions and mental health literacy, and secondarily to improve mental health and organisational outcomes. The intervention was designed collaboratively with Victoria Police based on a mixed methods pilot study, and combines multi-session leadership coaching for the senior officers within stations (e.g., Sergeants, Senior Sergeants) with tailored mental health literacy training for lower and upper ranks. Intervention effectiveness will be evaluated using a two-arm cluster-randomised trial design, with 12 police stations randomly assigned to the intervention and 12 to the non-intervention/usual care control condition. Data will be collected from all police members in each station (estimated at >20 per station). Psychosocial working conditions (e.g., supervisory support, job control, job demands), mental health literacy (e.g., knowledge, confidence in assisting someone who may have a mental health problem), and mental health will be assessed using validated measures. Organisational outcomes will include organisational depression disclosure norms, organisational cynicism, and station-level sickness absence rates. The trial will be conducted following CONSORT guidelines. Identifying data will not be collected in order to protect participant privacy and to optimise participation, hence changes in primary and secondary outcomes will be assessed using a two-sample t-test comparing summary measures by arm, with weighting by cluster size. This intervention is novel in its integration of stressor-reduction and mental health literacy-enhancing strategies. Effectiveness will be rigorously evaluated, and if positive results are observed, the intervention will be adapted across Victoria Police (total employees ~16,500) as well as possibly in other policing contexts, both nationally and internationally. Current Controlled Trials: ISRCTN82041334 . Registered 24th July, 2014.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 258 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 15%
Researcher 29 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 11%
Student > Bachelor 27 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 8%
Other 49 19%
Unknown 66 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 58 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 15%
Social Sciences 28 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 4%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 79 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2017.
All research outputs
#3,050,628
of 23,868,920 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#1,150
of 4,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,936
of 300,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#24
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,868,920 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,989 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.