↓ Skip to main content

A content validity and cognitive interview process to evaluate an Illness Perception Questionnaire for African Americans with type 2 diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A content validity and cognitive interview process to evaluate an Illness Perception Questionnaire for African Americans with type 2 diabetes
Published in
BMC Research Notes, May 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13104-019-4342-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olayinka O. Shiyanbola, Daniel Bolt, Adati Tarfa, Carolyn Brown, Earlise Ward

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 15%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Lecturer 4 7%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 17 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 17%
Social Sciences 7 12%
Psychology 6 10%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 18 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2019.
All research outputs
#13,961,768
of 23,149,216 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,812
of 4,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,759
of 350,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#38
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,149,216 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.