You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Barriers that limit the implementation of thermal fogging for the control of dengue in Colombia: a study of mixed methods
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, May 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12889-019-7029-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andrés F. Usuga, Lina M. Zuluaga-Idárraga, Natalia Alvarez, Raúl Rojo, Enrique Henao, Guillermo L. Rúa-Uribe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 22% |
Italy | 1 | 11% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 19 | 22% |
Researcher | 16 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 14% |
Lecturer | 7 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 14% |
Unknown | 16 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
Other | 17 | 20% |
Unknown | 24 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2019.
All research outputs
#7,061,613
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,286
of 15,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,508
of 351,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#224
of 403 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 403 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.