↓ Skip to main content

Head Position in Stroke Trial (HeadPoST) – sitting-up vs lying-flat positioning of patients with acute stroke: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Head Position in Stroke Trial (HeadPoST) – sitting-up vs lying-flat positioning of patients with acute stroke: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13063-015-0767-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paula Muñoz-Venturelli, Hisatomi Arima, Pablo Lavados, Alejandro Brunser, Bin Peng, Liying Cui, Lily Song, Laurent Billot, Elizabeth Boaden, Maree L. Hackett, Stephane Heritier, Stephen Jan, Sandy Middleton, Verónica V. Olavarría, Joyce Y. Lim, Richard I. Lindley, Emma Heeley, Thompson Robinson, Octavio Pontes-Neto, Lkhamtsoo Natsagdorj, Ruey-Tay Lin, Caroline Watkins, Craig S. Anderson, for the HeadPoST Collaborative Investigators

Abstract

Positioning a patient lying-flat in the acute phase of ischaemic stroke may improve recovery and reduce disability, but such a possibility has not been formally tested in a randomised trial. We therefore initiated the Head Position in Stroke Trial (HeadPoST) to determine the effects of lying-flat (0°) compared with sitting-up (≥30°) head positioning in the first 24 hours of hospital admission for patients with acute stroke. We plan to conduct an international, cluster randomised, crossover, open, blinded outcome-assessed clinical trial involving 140 study hospitals (clusters) with established acute stroke care programs. Each hospital will be randomly assigned to sequential policies of lying-flat (0°) or sitting-up (≥30°) head position as a 'business as usual' stroke care policy during the first 24 hours of admittance. Each hospital is required to recruit 60 consecutive patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), and all patients with acute intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) (an estimated average of 10), in the first randomised head position policy before crossing over to the second head position policy with a similar recruitment target. After collection of in-hospital clinical and management data and 7-day outcomes, central trained blinded assessors will conduct a telephone disability assessment with the modified Rankin Scale at 90 days. The primary outcome for analysis is a shift (defined as improvement) in death or disability on this scale. For a cluster size of 60 patients with AIS per intervention and with various assumptions including an intracluster correlation coefficient of 0.03, a sample size of 16,800 patients at 140 centres will provide 90% power (α 0.05) to detect at least a 16% relative improvement (shift) in an ordinal logistic regression analysis of the primary outcome. The treatment effect will also be assessed in all patients with ICH who are recruited during each treatment study period. HeadPoST is a large international clinical trial in which we will rigorously evaluate the effects of different head positioning in patients with acute stroke. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02162017 (date of registration: 27 April 2014); ANZCTR identifier: ACTRN12614000483651 (date of registration: 9 May 2014). Protocol version and date: version 2.2, 19 June 2014.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 191 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Researcher 18 9%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 6%
Other 44 23%
Unknown 58 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 39 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 20%
Neuroscience 10 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 71 37%