↓ Skip to main content

Field trial on a novel control method for the dengue vector, Aedes aegypti by the systematic use of Olyset® Net and pyriproxyfen in Southern Vietnam

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Field trial on a novel control method for the dengue vector, Aedes aegypti by the systematic use of Olyset® Net and pyriproxyfen in Southern Vietnam
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-6-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takashi Tsunoda, Hitoshi Kawada, Trang T T Huynh, Loan Le Luu, San Hoang Le, Huu Ngoc Tran, Huong Thi Que Vu, Hieu Minh Le, Futoshi Hasebe, Ataru Tsuzuki, Masahiro Takagi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 154 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 24%
Student > Master 30 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 14%
Other 12 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 28 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 21%
Social Sciences 16 10%
Environmental Science 8 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 34 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#2,157
of 6,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,975
of 296,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#15
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.