↓ Skip to main content

Chronic myeloid leukemia incidence, survival and accessibility of tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a report from population-based Lithuanian haematological disease registry 2000–2013

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chronic myeloid leukemia incidence, survival and accessibility of tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a report from population-based Lithuanian haematological disease registry 2000–2013
Published in
BMC Cancer, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12885-016-2238-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tumas Beinortas, Ilma Tavorienė, Tadas Žvirblis, Rolandas Gerbutavičius, Mindaugas Jurgutis, Laimonas Griškevičius

Abstract

Currently available chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) survival reports have originated from more affluent countries. Herein we report the entire country data on incidence and survival of CML, as well as penetrance of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in Lithuania. We analyzed all patients (N = 601) from the national haematological disease monitoring system who were diagnosed with CML between 2000 and 2013. Crude (CR) and age-standardized (weighted) (ASW(R)) incidence and mortality rates, as well as 1-, 5-, and 10-year relative survival rates (RSR) were calculated. Information on TKI penetration is also reported. Throughout the entire 2000-2013 period the median age at diagnosis of CML patients was 62 years. The respective incidence and mortality CRs were 1.28 and 0.78, both characterized by decreasing trends over the observation period. A 5-year RSR increased from 0.33 [95 % CI, 0.27-0.40] in 2000-2004 to 0.55 [95 % CI, 0.47-0.63] in 2005-2009. However, the respective 5-year RSRs for patients aged 65-74 and ≥75 were only 0.33 [95 % CI, 0.24-0.42] and 0.18 [95 % CI 0.07-0.23] during the entire study period. TKI penetrance for CML patients grew from 1.5 % in 2000-2004 to 30.6 % in 2005-2009 and 69.1 % in 2010-2013. TKI penetrance was low in the older age groups (60 % for the 65-74 and 19 % for the ≥75 patient group, in 2010-2013). Relative CML survival in Lithuania steadily improved and paralleled the increase in TKI treatment availability. Patients above 64 years rarely received TKIs and their relative survival remained low throughout the observation period. The latency of TKI availability may have influenced the survival trends.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Kenya 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Other 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 11 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 44%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2016.
All research outputs
#20,313,158
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#6,503
of 8,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,818
of 299,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#141
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,315 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.